Ebola and the Absent Western “Humanitarians” | Global Research
Doubts rightfully linger over the intentions of the West and its “humanitarian interventions.”
The US spent over two billion dollars during
NATO’s armed assault on Libya both in ordnance used during months of
aerial bombardment and in covert support for terrorists used as proxy
ground forces in the overthrow of the Libyan government. The United
Kingdom is estimated to have spent even more. Hundreds of millions were
spent by other NATO members throughout the duration of the assault. The
“protection of civilians” was repeatedly cited as the altruistic
justification for such an expenditure in manpower and financial
resources.
In the wake of the conflict, it was revealed that NATO’s
“humanitarian intervention” left entire cities filled with unarmed
civilians encircled by Al Qaeda-linked militants and relentlessly
bombarded by NATO sorties while food, water, gas, and power were
intentionally cut off to “starve” the inhabitants into submission. It
was also revealed that the threat to civilians cited by NATO members was fabricated by those NATO chose to replace the targeted Libyan government with.
