Exploiting Emotions About Paris to Blame Snowden, Distract from Actual Culprits Who Empowered ISIS : Information Clearing House - ICH
Exploiting Emotions About Paris to Blame Snowden, Distract from Actual Culprits Who Empowered ISIS
By Glenn Greenwald
November 16, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "The Intercept" -
Whistleblowers are always accused of helping America’s enemies (top
Nixon aides accused Daniel Ellsberg of being a Soviet spy and causing
the deaths of Americans with his leak); it’s just the tactical playbook
that’s automatically used. So it’s of course unsurprising that ever
since Edward Snowden’s whistleblowing
enabled newspapers around the world to report on secretly implemented
programs of mass surveillance, he has been accused by “officials” and
their various media allies of Helping The Terrorists™.
Still, I was a bit surprised just by how quickly and blatantly — how
shamelessly — some of them jumped to exploit the emotions prompted by
the carnage in France to blame Snowden: doing so literally as the bodies
still lay on the streets of Paris. At first, the tawdry exploiters were
the likes of crazed ex-intelligence officials (former CIA chief James
Woolsey, who once said Snowden “should be hanged by his neck until he is
dead” and now has deep ties to private NSA contractors, along with
Iran–obsessed Robert Baer); former Bush/Cheney apparatchiks (ex-White
House spokesperson and current Fox personality Dana Perino); right-wing
polemicists fired from BuzzFeed for plagiarism; and obscure Fox News
comedians (Perino’s co-host). So it was worth ignoring save for the
occasional Twitter retort.
But now we’ve entered the inevitable
“U.S. Officials Say” stage of the “reporting” on the Paris attack —
i.e., journalists mindlessly and uncritically repeat whatever U.S.
officials whisper in their ear about what happened. So now credible news
sites are regurgitating the claim that the Paris Terrorists were
enabled by Snowden leaks — based on no evidence or specific proof of any
kind, needless to say, but just the unverified, obviously self-serving
assertions of government officials. But much of the U.S. media loves to
repeat rather than scrutinize what government officials tell them to
say. So now this accusation has become widespread and is thus worth
examining with just some of the actual evidence.