Actvism Munichs recommendation of the day: NachDenkSeiten excerpts from the article:
"Unfortunately, the whistleblower, which we owe to the documents, however, made the terrible mistake to turn to the Western mass media to publish the data. So it is that the first" big story "that today in the Guardian Papers has been associated with the Panama published, revolves solely around Vladimir Putin and a fraudulent cello player. the story will be already correct and I have no doubt turn that Putin skeletons in the closet has. But why such a one focuses on Russia? the Russian assets are just a small part of the money that is hidden using Mossack Fonseca. In fact, it looks more like it, that the very selective reporting stinks itself. "
"What would have happened if you had searched the Mossack-Fonseca data after the name of the owner of the western media groups, their company and all editors and senior journalists? What if you could scan the data for all senior people within the BBC and what would have happened if you had searched the Mossack Fonseca-data for all donors of the Center for Public Integrity and their business? "
