Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence
Notable excerpt from the article:
"There is still no such evidence for any of these claims. What we have
instead are assertions, disseminated by anonymous people, completely
unaccompanied by any evidence, let alone proof. As a result, none of the
purported evidence — still — can be publicly seen, reviewed, or
discussed. Anonymous claims leaked to newspapers about what the CIA
believes do not constitute proof, and certainly do not constitute
reliable evidence that substitutes for actual evidence that can be
reviewed. Have we really not learned this lesson yet?"
