The US-EU Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA). Devastating Social and Environmental Consequences | Global Research
The US-EU Trans-Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA). Devastating Social and Environmental Consequences | Global Research
 The Transatlantic Free Trade Agreement (TAFTA) between the US and EU aims to ‘protect’ investment and remove ‘unnecessary regulatory barriers’. Corporate
 interests are driving the agenda, the public have been sidelined and 
unaccountable, pro-free-trade bureaucrats are facilitating the strategy 
(1). 
 
There is growing concern that the negotiations could result in the opening of the floodgates for GMOs and shale gas (fracking) in Europe,
 the threatening of digital and labour rights and the empowering of 
corporations to legally challenge a wide range of regulations which they
 dislike.
One
 of the key aspects of the negotiations is that both the EU and US 
should recognise their respective rules and regulations, which in 
practice could reduce regulation to the lowest common denominator. The 
official language talks of ‘mutual recognition’ of standards or 
so-called reduction of non-tariff barriers. For the EU, that could mean 
accepting US standards in many areas, including food and agriculture, 
which are lower than the EU’s.
 
Even the leaders of the US Senate Finance Committee, in a letter to
 U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, made it clear that any agreement 
must reduce EU restrictions on genetically modified crops, chlorinated 
chickens and hormone-treated beef.
 
Food
 lobby group Food and Drink Europe, representing the largest food 
companies (Unilever, Kraft, Nestlé, etc.), has welcomed the 
negotiations, with one of their key demands being the facilitation of 
the low level presence of unapproved GM crops. 
 
 