MH 17: The unanswered questions
Western media sources were quick to
point the finger at "Russian-backed rebels" operating in Eastern
Ukraine, operating a "Russian missile system" to down the Malaysian Airlines
flight MH 17 in July 2014. Even the name of Russia's President was
invoked...all without a shred of evidence one year on. Here are some
questions to be answered.
point the finger at "Russian-backed rebels" operating in Eastern
Ukraine, operating a "Russian missile system" to down the Malaysian Airlines
flight MH 17 in July 2014. Even the name of Russia's President was
invoked...all without a shred of evidence one year on. Here are some
questions to be answered.
1. To make an accusation, you need proof.
Without the proof, the accusation amounts to slander or libel. The
official enquiry has not yet delivered any hard evidence pointing
towards Russia's involvement in the incident, either passively or
actively. Therefore are accusations to the contrary, without evidence to
back them up, simply examples of slander and libel levelled by those
who have lied time and time and time and time and time again?
Without the proof, the accusation amounts to slander or libel. The
official enquiry has not yet delivered any hard evidence pointing
towards Russia's involvement in the incident, either passively or
actively. Therefore are accusations to the contrary, without evidence to
back them up, simply examples of slander and libel levelled by those
who have lied time and time and time and time and time again?
2. OCSE monitor Michael Bociurkiw in an
interview shortly after the incident on July 17 that there are two or
three pieces of fuselage which show indications of heavy machine-gun
fire and no evidence of missile damage. How to explain this?
interview shortly after the incident on July 17 that there are two or
three pieces of fuselage which show indications of heavy machine-gun
fire and no evidence of missile damage. How to explain this?
