Science? Bought and paid for
(NaturalNews) Some of the scientific studies on vaccines show strong
links to serious vaccine injuries. Other scientific studies on vaccines
show no links to vaccine injuries. What is going on? Both sides of this
issue quote their studies, and the public is understandably confused.
How can scientific studies on the same subject have opposite findings
and conclusions? I think I know the answer, and it isn't pretty. The
major factor is who paid for the study or where the livelihood of the
scientists comes from. If we look at the studies that show no problems
with vaccines, they are nearly always funded by the CDC and/or the
vaccine companies, or the livelihood of the scientists is tied to the
vaccine industry. If we look at the studies that show major problems
with vaccines, they are almost always done by independent scientists who
are not financially dependent on the CDC or vaccine companies. We could
cling to the naive belief that all science is a search for truth and
corruption is rare, but that doesn't seem to be the case when it comes
to science and vaccines. (Story by Dr. William H. Gaunt, republished
from AgeOfAutism.com with additional editing by Natural News)
