martes, 6 de octubre de 2015

The Trans-Pacific Free-Trade Charade | analysis | Hindustan Times

The Trans-Pacific Free-Trade Charade | analysis | Hindustan Times



The Trans-Pacific Free-Trade Charade


  • Joseph E. Stiglitz and Adam S. Hersh, Project Syndicate
  • As negotiators and ministers from the United States and 11 other
    Pacific Rim countries meet in Atlanta in an effort to finalize the
    details of the sweeping new Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), some sober analysis is warranted. The biggest regional trade and investment agreement in history is not what it seems.



    You will hear much about the importance of the TPP for “free trade.”
    The reality is that this is an agreement to manage its members’ trade
    and investment relations – and to do so on behalf of each country’s most
    powerful business lobbies. Make no mistake: It is evident from the main
    outstanding issues, over which negotiators are still haggling, that the
    TPP is not about “free” trade.



    New Zealand has threatened to walk away from the agreement over the
    way Canada and the US manage trade in dairy products. Australia is not
    happy with how the US and Mexico manage trade in sugar. And the US is
    not happy with how Japan manages trade in rice. These industries are
    backed by significant voting blocs in their respective countries. And
    they represent just the tip of the iceberg in terms of how the TPP would
    advance an agenda that actually runs counter to free trade.
 



Joseph E. Stiglitz
(Project syndicate)